Vocab from Political Debate: Bellicose

Wondrous Words Wednesday

It’s time for Wondrous Words Wednesday!  For more great words to add to your vocab, visit Kathy at Bermudaonion.net.

I like to listen to the news on the way to school, but my kids complain that it’s always negative.  War in Syria, shootings in the US, and fights in Congress.  The past few days have had a lot of coverage on the current battle at the Capitol over the budget and the health care bill.

I wish they would stop bickering and get to work.

Anyway, I heard a great word nerdy word:

The bellicose politicians refuse to back down in their fight to defund “Obamacare.”

bellicose \’bel-I-cōs\ adj, from Latin bellicus, of war; favoring or inclined to start quarrels or wars

I knew “bella” means pretty; clearly “belli” has a very different meaning!

Word Nerd Workout

There are TONS of synonyms for this word.  What does that say about us?  Anyway, leave a few in the comments.  I’ve featured one as a word nerd word before.  I’ll give you a hint:

You get it? Pug?
You get it? Pug?

Banned Book Week Winner!

Congrats to Nicole Goodman of Work in Sweats Mama.  She won a copy of Looking for Alaska or another banned book as part of my giveaway! Thanks everyone for commenting.  I hope you all get a chance to read a banned book soon.  Visit Nerdy Book Club for a great post with micro reviews of several banned books.

Thanks for getting nerdy with me today!

Julia 

 

Why Banning Books Is a Bad Idea

 

Lord of the FliesI’m a conservative mother.  I don’t let my kids watch PG-13 movies until they are 13. And I reserve the right to label some books as “PG-13” as well.  But would I want them banned from schools and libraries?  No way.

We need to be cognizant of what we expose ourselves and our children to.  According to the ALA site, most book bans start from this premise: to protect children.

But removing books from public access doesn’t sit well with this word nerd.  Especially since I know that in our society, explicit language and sexual content abound on radio, TV, and the Internet.  We could take Looking for Alaska out of the library.  But a kid can go home and watch a You Tube video that glorifies smoking and sex but lacks the important and eloquent messages that come along with Alaska: the struggle to handle ambiguity; learning to grieve; finding one’s place in a confusing world.

One also wouldn’t learn any cool new vocabulary.  😉

My husband, aka Devil’s Advocate, points out that watching TV and viewing You Tube are private activities.  Libraries and most schools are public institutions.  But please.  Wouldn’t it be better for kids to read, think about, and discuss the controversial topics of racism or abuse or sexuality in the context of a book?  Perhaps, best case, under the guidance of an adult/parent/teacher?

Most Frequently Banned

13 Reasons WhyHere’s the list of the ten most banned/ challenged books of 2012:

  • Captain Underpants
  • The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian
  • Thirteen Reasons Why
  • Fifty Shades of Grey
  • And Tango Makes Three
  • The Kite Runner
  • Looking for Alaska
  • Scary Stories
  • The Glass Castle
  • Beloved

Have you read any of these?  I have.  And I can understand the concern about offensive content.  I couldn’t even get through Beloved because of its raw and powerful description of the ramifications of slavery.  And I’m no fan of Captain Underpants, but if it gets a kid interested in reading, why not?

Now, if any of my children come home with 50 Shades of Grey, I’ll tell them it’s rated R, and they need to wait until they are eighteen. Yikes.  Would any school librarian really buy that for the library?

Here is a list of often banned classics:

  • The Great Gatsby
  • The Catcher in the Rye
  • The Grapes of Wrath
  • To Kill a Mockingbird
  • The Color Purple
  • Lord of the Flies
  • Of Mice and Men
  • Gone With the Wind
  • The Lord of the Rings

These books are all icons of literature, and their value far outshines their offensive content.  Again, I have never liked The Catcher in the Rye, but I want my kids to read it and discuss it with me.  My thirteen year old recently read Lord of the Flies, and we compared it to The Hunger Games in its commentary on human nature.  Later, we could add Heart of Darkness  to that reading list.

Why Banning is Bad

In short, I realize that some words offend. But having no words at all would be much worse.  I don’t want to perseverate on controversial issues, but I can’t hide from them either.  Why not start the conversation with a book?

How do you feel about the idea of banning books with offensive content?  

Thanks for sharing your ideas!

Julia 

 

Vocab for Banned Books Week: Expunge

 

wondrous memeWelcome to Wondrous Words Wednesday, an awesome meme for Word Nerds hosted by Kathy at Bermudaonion.net.  Visit her site for links to fun and interesting words!

It’s Banned Books Week, and I had to pick a word that fits the theme of the week: bringing attention to books that have been banned or removed from libraries and schools for offensive content.

The editor wanted to expunge the offensive language from the manuscript, but the author refused censor his own work.

Expunge \ik-‘spənj\ verb; from Latin expungere to mark for deletion by dots; to strike out, obliterate, or mark for deletion; to efface completely; to eliminate (as a memory) from one’s consciousness

Words can build up or destroy.  We must be careful how we use them; we should be aware of what we read.  But I’m not comfortable with expunging the words, or  volumes, of another writer, even if I don’t agree with them.

Word Nerd Workout

Complete this analogy, with a review of another good word for Banned Books Week!

expunge:delete:: expurgate: __________

Thanks for getting nerdy with me today!

Banned Book Week 2013Banned Books Week Giveaway!

Anyone who comments on the blog between Sept 20 and 29 will be entered into a drawing to win a copy of Looking for Alaska or another banned book from the ALA’s Banned Books List.  

For links to other great posts on banned books, visit Sheila over at Book Journey.

Tell me how you feel about banning books, or share some of your favorite banned books.

Thanks readers!

Julia 

Banned Book Review: Looking for Alaska

Banned Book Week 2013

Have you ever been upset to discover that one of your favorite books has been banned?  I have. Sheila over at Book Journey wants to spread awareness about banned books, and I’m joining in!

You can find more posts about banned books at her site, as well long lists of books that have been banned or challenged at the American Library Association Website.

 

 

Note: According to the ALA:

A challenge is an attempt to remove or restrict materials, based upon the objections of a person or group.  A banning is the removal of those materials.  Challenges do not simply involve a person expressing a point of view; rather, they are an attempt to remove material from the curriculum or library, thereby restricting the access of others.

Now, I admit, I have some issues with Looking for Alaska, by John Green.  But do I think it should be banned?  No way.

Looking for Alaska has the witty voice, literary references, and BIG IDEAS that I’ve come to expect from Mr. Green.  It earned the Printz Award for excellence in YA literature as well as a recommendation from Common Sense Media for older teen reads.

But Looking for Alaska has a lot of content: drinking, smoking, sex.  Enough to earn it a spot on the American Library Association’s list of top ten frequently challenged books of 2012.  The reasons cited on the ALA site: offensive language, sexually explicit, and unsuited for age group.

Looking for AlaskaThe Premise

Miles Halter has never fit in.  He decides to leave his public high school in Florida for a private boarding school in the sweltering heat of Alabama.  There, in his search for “The Great Perhaps”, he meets Alaska Young.  She’s curvy, talks about “boob honks,” and has a suicidal smoking habit.

Immediately, Miles is smitten.

I wanted to smack him in the head.

What I didn’t like

I realized quickly that the tone of this novel is much different from Paper Towns or The Fault in Our Stars.

  1. Crudeness prevails.  But, this is a story told by a 17-year-old boy living with other teens under minimal supervision.
  2. Miles never resists the pressure to smoke.  Day one, he lights up.
  3. Very important:  Alaska annoys me.  She spouts off about our patriarchal society and its objectification of women while she’s wearing a tight tank top and short cut-offs.  She says she’s “not trying to be flirty” when she lays down and puts her head in Miles’s lap.  She’s moody, self-absorbed, and screwed up.  But Miles, and many of his companions, love her. (Foolish, hormonal boys!)

What I did like

Even though I didn’t enjoy the characters, I persevered to the end of Looking for Alaska.  And I found some cool stuff.

  1. Miles must write a paper that answers the question: “What is your cause for hope?”  His insights are thoughtful and authentic.  This question permeates the novel and is an excellent discussion point.
  2. Mr. Green redeemed himself to me with his “Intentionally vague and broad discussion questions” in the reader’s guide.  He pulls out the big issues of the book- forgiveness, ambiguity, grief, – and underscores the meaning behind all the adolescent shenanigans in his novel.  On the issue of teen smoking, he asks, “Why would anyone ever pay money in exchange for the opportunity to acquire lung cancer and/or emphysema?”  Oh, the symbolism!
  3. Great lines like this:

If we could only see the endless string of consequences that result from our smallest actions.  But we can’t know better until knowing better is useless.  

See?  Wow.

And so, despite the offensive content, I hope Looking for Alaska stays available to teens.  Even though some parts made me cringe, other parts made me think.  And that’s what matters.

Caveat:  I don’t want my children to read it until they are at least 17, but that’s my decision, not the government’s.

Have you read a book like Looking for Alaska that had offensive content but also important big ideas?  How do you feel about the banning of books?

Banned Books Week Giveaway!

Anyone who comments on the blog between Sept 20 and Sept 29 will be entered into a drawing to win a copy of Looking for Alaska or another book from the ALA Banned book list. Share your thoughts!

Julia 

 

 

Vocab from Artemis Fowl: Salubrious

wondrous memeWelcome to Wondrous Words Wednesday, an awesome meme for improving your vocabulary. Check out the links at Bermudaonion.net for more words to learn!

My entry this week comes from the fifth book in the Artemis Fowl series, The Lost Colony.   I’m listening to it with my kids on the long drive to and from sports practice.  As always, the humorous adventure story keeps me awake almost as well as my tea.  Yay to the wily dwarf Mulch Diggums for introducing me to this new word:

The next room was cleaner and more salubrious than the bathroom he had just left.

The Lost Colonysalubrious \sə-‘lü-brē-əs\ adj. from the Latin salubris healthful; favorable or promoting health or well-being

I thought it simply meant more appealing, but I should have known better!  I took Spanish and know that salud means “health”.

Word Nerd Workout

Share a salubrious place, or better yet, a salubrious activity that you enjoy.

My salubrious activity: I ran 3.5 miles this morning.  Woo hoo!  (I’ve been a busy mama with only 30 minutes to run for years, and I’m trying to break out of the 30 minutes/ 3 miles rut.  Wish me luck.)

Now it’s your turn!

Thanks for getting nerdy with me today!

Julia 

Why I Need To Limit MY Screen Time

I have been blessed with four voracious readers.  Their reading habits have earned them near notoriety in our small town.  And when people ask how my children read so many books, I often answer, “I limit their screen time.”

Photo1 (32)
I love these answers from child #3!

Don’t get me wrong.  My kids love their little devices and games, especially Minecraft.  The battle to curtail screen time grows more arduous as devices get smaller and more portable. When child #1 briefly uses my iPhone to “check his clan”, children #3 and #4 whine, “Can’t we have electronic time too?”

Sigh.  But I won’t give up.  Because when I say, “No, it’s NOT electronic time,” my children groan and then go off to pick up a book.  It is their default activity.

Last week, my friend Caroline shared an awesome article from The Huffington Post called, “8 Ways Screens Are Ruining Your Family’s Life.”  With a somewhat smug smile, I read through the summarized research about why kids shouldn’t sit in front of screens: decreased attention span, limited creativity, etc.  I knew all this.  I was a good mama.

But then I got to the reasons why screens are bad for adults.  And the smug smile disappeared.

Three points struck me.  Hard.

  1. Kids hate it when we pay attention to our screens instead of them.  They see it as hypocritical that we limit their screen time, but not ours.  Ouch.  We should be attentive to their needs, not checking Facebook updates.  I know this, and yet I’ve been guilty of holding up my finger to a child and saying, “Just a minute,” to finish a comment.   (Maybe I’m not such a good mom.)
  2. Our spouses hate it when we pay more attention to our screens, too.  See #1.  Same general idea.
  3. Checking email / Facebook/ Twitter isn’t relaxing.  Staring at a lighted, electronic screen is stimulating, not calming.  Researchers suggest that when we have a few (rare, precious) moments to rest in our day, we shouldn’t scroll through Pinterest.  We should sit down, take a walk, or maybe, READ!

This article came to me shortly after I read my friend Amy’s post on how she gave up television for the month of August and had more time to read and write.

I feel like someone is trying to tell me something.  Like, “Put down the phone!”

Do these devices = the enemy?
Do these devices = the enemy?

So, I’ve resolved to spend less time in front of screens and more time in conscious, meaningful interaction with my family and friends.  I’m also hoping to get more valuable reading done.  For example, while my son got a cavity filled this morning, I read the latest issue of Writers Digest  and picked up a few great tips for the manuscript I’m editing.

Social media has a place, but I need to define that place and set aside a specific time in the day for commenting on blogs and posting to Facebook.  When my hubby and kids aren’t home.

My husband, ever the Devil’s Advocate (sometimes just to spite me), made this point when I shared my concerns about adult screen time:  “I read more now because of my phone than I did before.”  And, he does.  He used to watch more T.V.  So he has traded one screen for another.  If the content is better, is that change an improvement?

Where do you stand on screen time?  How do you set boundaries to limit screen time for yourself and your family?

Thanks for helping me out!

Julia